Debate: Prohibition of flag burning - Debatepedia.
Essay on Flag Burning: The Debate Continues - Abstract Several times in our nation's history, Congress has introduced a bill that would provide for banning flag desecration. Each time, however, the Supreme Court ruled that this act was protected by the First Amendment freedom of speech rights. The debate over this topic continues, with both.The proponents of the flag burning amendment believe that the burning of a flag does not fall under the protection of the First amendment. The reason is because burning a flag is not an expression of speech but rather an act. In the case of Texas V. Johnson, Chief Justice William Rehnquist stated that “flag burning is the equivalent of an.The prohibition of flag burning prevents the breaches of peace that are prompted by such protests. Given that the flag does enjoy such respect amongst the citizens, those near such an act of desecration might rightly be angered. The stimulation of shock and outrage in the immediate audience may be the intention of the protestor. It is not.
Flag Burning essaysFifty one white stars, and thirteen red and white stripes should not be anywhere near the line of fire. The legalization of flag burning should not be prohibited in our country. Flag burning is absolutely not a valid form of political expression under the first amendment, becau.The question was whether flag burning was a form of freedom of speech.. Flag burning is not wrong because everyone has the freedom of speech and flag burning is part of free speech.. In conclusion, flag burning is free speech.. Taking away the right of flag burning would be taking away what the flag represents.. Word Count: 546.
Flag burning can be and usually is a very controversial issue with people. Many people believe that the American flag stands for something important and shouldn't be destroyed in that manner. Others believe that flag burning is a statement that one should be able to make without major repercussions.
